This order dismisses a writ petition filed challenging respondent inaction over an FIR registration. The court found an FIR had been registered based on uncontradicted submission and closed the petition without costs.
Petition closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
W.P.NO.15002 OF 2018
O R D E R
Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in registering the FIR on the complaint lodged by the petitioners on 14-01-2017, the present writ petition is filed.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, by producing written instructions dated 5.6.2018, would submit that based on the complaint of the petitioners, case in Crime No.93/2018 under Sections 506 and 507 read with 34 of IPC, has been registered on 28.04.2018 and investigation is under progress.
In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, which is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, no orders
need be passed in the writ petition and the same is accordingly closed.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No costs. ------------------------------------------ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J DATE:06—06—2018 AVS
Petitioners
State/Respondents
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
