classified as Government land and, therefore, this Court preserved to the petitioner therein the remedy under Section 9 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971. On the other hand, in the case on hand, without there being adjudication of primary facts in issue between the parties, the writ petition is allowed and direction is issued to receive the document as and when presented by sole respondent for registration. He further points out that by reference to Section 22-A of the Registration Act and Section 4 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act in all the writ petitions filed with a grievance under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, the proper and necessary parties are the District Collector and Tahsildar of subject matter in the writ petition, for according to him, the Sub-Registrar even while acting under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, acts only on the inputs given by the Revenue, Endowment, Wakf etc., Therefore, the registration or refusal of registration of such document must be in the presence of Revenue, Endowment, Wakf etc., as the case may be. The practical or procedural difficulty is that filing a writ petition without proper and necessary party results only in another round of litigation and at that time, the objection under Order II Rule 2 CPC is available to respondents. Therefore, he prays for setting aside the order under appeal and fairly states that the respondent, if has a grievance on any of the aspects viz., resumption order which the appellants are relying on and/ or inclusion of subject land as Government land, can work out the remedies under the ROR Act before the Joint Collector.
