In the affidavit, filed in support of W.P. No.38480 of 2017, the respondent-writ petitioner has stated that, aggrieved by the said endorsement, Sri B. Radha Krishna Varma had filed an appeal and, on its dismissal, had filed W.P. No.4293 of 2014, which was disposed of along with W.P. No.4271 of 2014 dated 25.04.2014, directing the Mandal Revenue Officer, Paravada, Visakhapatnam to verify the genuineness of the certificates issued earlier; if the certificates were genuine, he should then communicate his decision to the Sub-Registrar, Lankelapalem, Visakhapanam, and also to the respondent-writ petitioner; if, according to the Mandal Revenue Officer, the status of the land, as per the revenue records, was not private patta land, the said information should then be furnished to the petitioner; such exercise should be completed within four weeks; the petitioners are simultaneous purchasers with Sri B. Radhakrishna Varma; on being made aware of the proceedings undertaken by him, and its likely impact on the petitioners, the first petitioner along with Sri B. Radhakrishna Varma had submitted a joint representation to the District Collector on 02.03.2017 and 20.07.2017 requesting him to delete the subject survey numbers from the list made under Section 22A(1) of the Registration Act; and the District Collector had passed the order dated 23.08.2017 even without considering the orders passed by this Court earlier.
