Writ appeal dismissed as the appellant's services as a Professor had been terminated, making the question of regularization moot. Appellant directed to pursue remedies in the pending writ petition No.29320 of 2018.
Appellant directed to amend prayer and pleadings in pending W.P.No.29320 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. GANGA RAO
WRI T APPEAL No.1603 of 2018
JUDGMENT : (per the Hon’ ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
The appellant is the petitioner in W.P.No.1987 of 2017 which was dismissed by a learned Judge of this Court, vide order dated 06.09.2018. Perusal of the order demonstrates that the learned Judge took note of the fact that during the pendency of W.P.No.1987 of 2017, filed for regularization of services, the 2nd respondentCollege terminated the services of the appellant-petitioner as a Professor, aggrieved by which she filed W.P.No.29320 of 2018. In this scenario, the learned Judge was of the opinion that it would be appropriate that the petitioner raise all pleas in the later writ petition and accordingly dismissed W.P.No.1987 of 2017. We find no error having been committed by the learned Judge warranting interference in appeal as the question of regularizing the services of the appellant-petitioner as a Professor in the 2nd respondent-College would not arise at this stage when her services in the said post have been terminated.
We accordingly make it clear that it would be open to the appellant-petitioner to seek amendment of her prayer and pleadings in the pending writ petition, viz., W.P.No.29320 of 2018, and pursue her remedies therein.
The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed, subject to the above observation. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
_________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
________________ M. GANGA RAO, J
30th November, 2018 KSM
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. GANGA RAO
WRI T APPEAL No.1603 of 2018
30th November, 2018
KSM
Appellant-Petitioner
Sanjay Kumar
M. Ganga Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
