Dismissed

Veedicherla Sreenadha Reddy, Spsr Nellore Dist v. Vedam Ravindra Babu, Spsr Nellore Dist and 2 Others

Telangana HC9 Nov 2018TRCMP/383/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed Transfer C.M.P. No. 838 of 2017 and Stay C.M.P. No. 965 of 2017 as they were filed regarding an O.P. from Khammam to Guntur. Both petitions were dismissed for default since neither petitioner nor respondent was present on the date of hearing.

What did the court decide?

Transfer C.M.P. dismissed for default; Stay C.M.P. disposed of as sequel; No order for costs.

Veedicherla Sreenadha Reddy, Spsr Nellore Dist Vs Vedam… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY

¶5

TR.C.M.P. NO: 838 OF 2017

¶6

Between:

¶7

Mrs. Lakshmi Pranavi, W/o. Sheemakurthi Ravi Kumar, D/o. Mattupalli Ravi Kumar, aged about 24 years, Housewife, Rl/o. Door No.12-16-17, Mattupallivari Veedhi, kothapeta, Guntur.

¶8

...PETITIONERYRESPONDENT

¶9

AND

¶10

Sheemakurthi Ravi Kiran, S/o. S. Ramalingam, Hindu, aged about 31 years, Occ: Business, No.6-12617, BCM Road, Opp: Saibaba Temple, Aswaraopet, Khammam.

¶11

.,.RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶12

Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to transfer O.P(H.M).No.68/20'1 7 pending on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Khammam District at Sathupalli to the Judge Family Court at Guntur,

¶13

TRCMPMP. NO: 96s OF 2017

¶14

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.P.(H.M).No.68/ 2017^pending on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Khammam District at Sathupallli.

¶15

For the Petitioner : SRI KONETI RAJA REODY, Advocate^{(not present)}

¶16

For the Respondent : M/s. N.RAGHUVEER, Advocate^{(not present)}

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

HONOURABLT] SRI JUSTICE^{A.VENKATESHWARAITEDDY} .I'RANSFER C.M. . No.838 OF 2017

¶19

ORDER:(ORAL.)

¶20

Learned counsel for both sides are called absent and there is no representation orr their behalf.

¶21

This transt-er civil miscellaneous petition is filed ibr transf-er of O.P. (H.M.) No.68 of 2017 from the file of Senior Civil Judge, Khammam District at Sathupalti to the file of the Judge, Family Court at Guntur. Therefbre, presence or representation on behalf of the petitioner is ltlt essential to ascertain status of H.M.O.P. No.68 of 20t1.

¶22

Hence, the transfer civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed fbr

¶23

default for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.

¶24

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in

¶25

this transfer civil miscellaneous petition stand closed.

¶26

Sd/-B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER

¶27

¶28

The Senior Civil Judge, Khammam District at Sathupalli. 2. One CC to Sri N.Raghuveer, Advocate (OPUC) One CC to Sri Koneti Raja Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 4. Two CD Copies 5. One Spare Copy Kj

¶29

HIGH COURT

¶30

DATED:2711012021

¶31

16€ s TAI€
c 1B N0\J?"0?1 d
cJ
*
I a
DEjlc(,.ac.

¶32

ORDER

¶33

TRCMP.No.838 of 2017

¶34

DISMISSING THE TR.CMP FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS.

¶35

@,,.
/,<br>12<br>

Veedicherla Sreenadha Reddy, Spsr Nellore Dist v. Vedam Ravindra Babu, Spsr Nellore Dist and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veedicherla Sreenadha Reddy, Spsr Nellore Dist v. Vedam Ravindra Babu, Spsr Nellore Dist and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumeer Textiles, Hyderabad Vs M/S. Variety Cloth Emporium, Medak District

M/s. Bharat Tanmai Sesham Estates Pvt. Ltd., Vs Sri Changanlal Mittal

K Swarnalatha, Guntur Dist and 2 Others Vs Smt. B Nagasai Ram, Hyderabad

The Mandal Revenue Officer and Another Vs S.M.Balasubramanayam and 5 Others

Vaddirju Swetha Vs Vaddiraju Dilip

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. and Another Vs Vandapandu Ramu and 2 Others