Dismissed
Dir of Income Tax [International Taxation], Hyderabad v. Nimmagadda Prasad, Secunderabad
Telangana HCITTA/536/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
ITTA.NO.536 OF 2017
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Ms K.Mamata, learned Standing Counsel for Income Tax, would submit that, in terms of CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018, all appeals, where the tax effect is below Rs.50,00,000/-, are required to be withdrawn and, as the value of the present appeal is less than Rs.50,00,000/-, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. Learned counsel would seek liberty to file an application for restoration of the appeal, in case it were to be found later that the subject matter of the appeal falls within the exceptions mentioned in the aforesaid Circular issued by the Central Board.
Granting liberty as sought for, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to state that, in case the appeal falls within any of the exceptions referred to in the Circular, this order shall not disable the appellant from furnishing details as to how the appeal falls within the said exceptions and, thereafter, to prefer a fresh appeal in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
_______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
__________________________________ KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J
Date:10.10.2018 usd
Ramesh Ranganathan
Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court