One judge dismissed the revision petition C.R.P. No. 643 of 2015 as infructuous on the submission that the cause did not survive for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
C.R.P.No.643 OF 2015
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause
in the revision petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the said submission, the revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this petition shall
stand closed.
___________________________________
JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
14.02.2018
kvrm
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
