The High Court dismissed the revision petition as infructuous because the underlying suit had already been disposed of by the trial Court. No other substantive order was passed.
No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
C.R.P.No.541 OF 2015
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the revision petition does not survive for adjudication as suit itself has been disposed of by the trial Court.
Recording the said submission, the revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this petition shall
stand closed.
___________________________________
JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
07.02.2018
kvrm
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
