Civil Revision Petition dismissed as a matter of law since the petitioner fairly conceded its prematurity, rendering further adjudication unnecessary.
The civil revision petition was dismissed. Pending miscellaneous applications were also dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5222 OF 2017
ORDER :
Learned Senior Counsel Sri V.L.N.G.K. Murthy appearing for the petitioner fairly conceded that this civil revision petition is premature.
In view of the said submission, no further adjudication is required at this stage to decide about the legality of the order passed by the Court below in E.A.No.6 of 2016 in E.P.No.2 of 2015 on the file of XI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
In the result, the civil revision petition is dismissed.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any,
shall also stand dismissed. No costs.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date:20.02.2018 SP
Petitioner
Respondent
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
