The Hon'ble Judge allowed a civil revision petition dismissed at admission holding no error of jurisdiction in the lower court's order allowing impleadment of a subsequent purchaser to avoid multiplicity of proceedings under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed at the stage of admission; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3670 of 2018
ORDER:
This Revision is filed assailing the order dt.21-04-2018 in I.A.No.89 of 2018 in O.S.No.14 of 2012 of the IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati.
MSR,J C.R.P.No.3670 of 2018
2
written statement, there was a delay in filing the application to implead the 2nd respondent.
MSR,J C.R.P.No.3670 of 2018
3
__________________________________ JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Date: 03-08-2018 Vsv
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order allowing impleadment of a subsequent purchaser constitutes an error of jurisdiction warranting revisional interference.
Whether the impleadment of a subsequent purchaser is necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings in a suit for specific performance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
