Single judge allowed civil revision petitions seeking recall of evidence. Court directed trial court to dispose of suit within two months after counsel conceded no objection to reopening evidence.
Direction to trial court to dispose suit within two months; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON Nos. 360 and 361 of 2016
COMMON ORDER:
These petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India questioning the orders in I.A.No.94 of 2016, and I.A.No.95 of 2016, filed under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC, for recall and reopening the evidence of defendants in O.S.No.150 of 2006 to cross examine DW.2; but the counsel for the respondent, while submitting that the suit is being dragged on for one reason or the other, reported no objection to reopen the evidence and recall DW.2 for cross examination of DW.2.
Therefore, in view of the endorsement made by the counsel on both the petitions, the petitions are ordered with a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible; in any event, not later than two months from the date of the order. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
______________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
16th November, 2018
KSM
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON Nos. 360 and 361 of 2016
16th November, 2018
KSM
2 issues framed by the court
Whether civil revision petitions filed to recall evidence for recross examination ought to be granted in light of respondent counsel's submission
Whether the trial court should be directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
