This court dismissed a civil revision petition challenging an order allowing re-assignment of a partition inquiry warrant to the same Advocate-Commissioner. The court held there was no error of jurisdiction under Article 227 as the petitioner never previously objected to the Commissioner's independence.
Revision petition dismissed at admission stage without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.182 of 2018
ORDER:
This Revision is filed assailing the order dt.08-12-2017 in I.A.No.122 of 2017 in O.S.No.140 of 2011 of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Madanapalle.
MSR,J C.R.P.No.182 of 2018
2
MSR,J C.R.P.No.182 of 2018
3
and nothing more. Therefore, there is no necessity for the said report to be scrapped first before granting relief of re-entrustment of warrant to the same Advocate-Commissioner.
__________________________________ JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Date: 20-04-2018 Vsv
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the lower court committed error of jurisdiction in re-entrusting the partition inquiry warrant to the same Advocate-Commissioner despite the petitioner's opposition.
Whether the earlier report by the Advocate-Commissioner needs to be scrapped before the re-assignment of the warrant for localization of properties.
Petitioner
Respondent
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
