Dismissed
Mohammed Abdul Jabbar v. Mohammed Farooq Hussain
Telangana HCCRP/1401/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION…
What the court decided
AI extract
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1401 OF 2016
ORDER :
The present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner questioning the order dated 08.02.1016 in I.A.No.31 of 2016 in O.S.No.2881 of 2015 passed by the IX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereby the petition filed under Rule 32 of the Civil Rules of Practice to permit Mohammed Zakir Ahmed to defend the suit on behalf of the defendant, was was allowed.
infructuous. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the present Civil Revision Petition stand closed.
______________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
05.11.2018 kvrm
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner
Respondents
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court