The High Court dismissed the pending criminal revision case for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or file representations on multiple listing dates, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
The criminal revision case and any pending miscellaneous petitions are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2570 OF 2011
ORDER:
When the matter was called on 22.10.2018, there was no representation for petitioner. Since it is an old matter of the year 2011, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is no more interested in prosecuting the criminal revision case.
Accordingly, this criminal revision case is dismissed for
non-prosecution. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions
pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
26.10.2018 SS
Petitioner
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
