Held the criminal revision case is dismissed as infructuous because the underlying decree case had already been disposed of by the lower court on 13.09.2017, rendering the interim order challenged obsolete.
Criminal revision case dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1101 OF 2012
ORDER:
This criminal revision case is filed by the 1st respondent, aggrieved by the order dated 30.06.2012, in Crl.M.P.No.939 of 2012 in D.V.C.No.05 of 2011 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Sulthanabad.
While so, the e-court information pertaining to Junior Civil Judges Courts, Sulthanabad, shows that the D.V.C.No.05 of 2011 was disposed of by the said court on 13.09.2017. In that view of the matter, this criminal revision case, which is filed against the interim order in D.V.C.No.05 of 2011, becomes infructuous. Sri Y.Soma Raju, learned counsel appearing for petitioner would submit that long back he has given no objection to the petitioner for engaging another counsel.
Having regard to the above circumstances, this criminal revision case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
12.11.2018 SS
1st respondent
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
