Court disposed of a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. without touching merits. It directed police to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. procedure along with guidelines from Arunesh Kumar and Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan cases.
Petition disposed directing police to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. procedure and related Apex Court guidelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Crl.P.No.954 of 2018
ORDER
This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings in Crime No.9 of 2018 of Ramagiri Police Station, Peddapalli District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 420, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(f), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, against the petitioner, on various grounds.
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
01.10.2018 kvrm
1 (2014) 8 SCC 273
2 2018 Law Suit (SC) 233
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition should be quashed or directed to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. procedure.
Whether the police must follow Arunesh Kumar guidelines during arrest procedures.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar v. State of BiharReferred¶5
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273 · Who else cites this
Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v State of Maharashtra and anotherReferred¶5
Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v State of Maharashtra and another 2018 Law Suit (SC) 233
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
