The High Court directed the police to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and Arnesh Kumar guidelines in a criminal petition filed to quash proceedings. The petition was disposed with this direction.
Directed police to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and Arnesh Kumar guidelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CRIMINAL PETITION No.9350 of 2018
ORDER :
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is filed to quash the proceedings in FIR No.253 of 2018 of Chevella P.S., Cyberabad, Rangareddy District.
After arguing the matter for awhile, learned counsel for the petitioner, requested this Court to direct the concerned to follow the procedure contemplated under Section 41-A Cr.P.C., and the guidelines issued by the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and another1
In view of the request made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Police of Chevella Police Station, Cyberabad, Rangareddy District, are directed to follow the procedure contemplated under Section 41-A Cr.P.C., and the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar’s case referred supra.
With the above direction, this Criminal Petition is disposed of.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J_
Date: 20.09.2018 eha
1 2014(8) SCALE 250
2
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Crl.P.No.9350 of 2018
Dt. 20.09.2018
eha
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar v. State of BiharReferred¶5
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
