準？ーかしりｏ?èóの?y 2011の事件において、連帯責任持たる被告に対する刑事手続きを部分的に却下し、324条には適用できないとする一方、498A条については却下せず、なお事件をどちらにも却下せず、指令を発行することなく終結した。
Proceedings quashed under Section 324 IPC; proceedings under Section 498A IPC dismissed; police directed to comply with apex court directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI
CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.8 4 6 0 of 2 0 1 1
ORDER:
This petition is filed, seeking for quash of the proceedings against the petitioner, who is A2, in C.C.No.8 of 2011 on the file of the Court of V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajahmundry. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 498A, 324 r/ w 34 IPC.
2
petitioner. Hence, the proceedings insofar as the offence under Section 324 IPC are liable to be quashed.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ T. RAJANI , J
August 29, 2018 LMV
3 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings against the petitioner under Section 498A IPC and Section 324 IPC read with Section 34 IPC are liable to be quashed.
Whether the petitioner's role as a supporter of an accused attracts the offence under Section 324 IPC.
How police must comply with apex court directions in quashing proceedings under Section 498A IPC in this case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajesha Sharma & others v. State of U.P. & anotherExplained¶11
Crl.A.No.1265 of 2017 (SLP (Crl.) No.2013 of 2017 in Rajesha Sharma & others v. State of U.P. & another
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI
State of Andhra Pradesh
T. RAJANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
