The Single Judge rejected the plea for anticipatory bail and clarified that the nature of allegations prima facie constitute the offences alleged, making the petition unfit for quashing. The Criminal Petition was dismissed.
Anticipatory bail plea dismissed; Criminal Petition No.8268 of 2018 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI
CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.8 2 6 8 of 2 0 1 8
ORDER:
This petition is filed seeking for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner/ A1, in Crime No.92 of 2018 on the file of Kaikaluru Police Station, Krishna District. The offences alleged are under Sections 354D, 417 IPC and Sections 3(2)(va) of SC ST (POA) Act, 1961.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ T. RAJANI , J
August 17, 2018 LMV
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition seeking anticipatory bail is a fit case for quashing of proceedings.
Whether the nature of allegations prima facie constitute the offences alleged against the petitioner.
SMT JUSTICE T. RAJANI
The Public Prosecutor
T. RAJANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
