Court disposed of quashing petition without addressing merits, directing police to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and Arnesh Kumar guidelines.
Directed the police concerned to follow the procedure under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and guidelines issued in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Crl.P.No.8230 of 2018
ORDER
This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings in Crime No.95 of 2018 of Atmakur Police Station, Kurnool District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 468 and 506 IPC against the petitioner, on various grounds.
______________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
03.08.2018 kvrm
1 (2014) 8 SCC 273
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings should be quashed or if the police should be directed to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. guidelines.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar v. State of BiharReferred¶5
(2014) 8 SCC 273 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
The Petitioner
State of A.P.
M SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Parties & counsel
