In a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought reduction of a mandatory deposition of Rs.50,000 required for sentence suspension. The court rejected the hardship claim, noting the petitioner is an employed Headmistress, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Petition No.1968 of 2018
ORDER :
This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C by the petitioner/ accused seeking to modify the order dated 01.12.2017 in Crl.M.P.No.26 of 2017 in Crl.A.No.150 of 2017 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hindupur, whereby and whereunder learned Judge while granting suspension of sentence till 05.01.2018, directed the petitioner to deposit Rs.50,000/- on or before 05.01.2018 and observed that failure to deposit, the order shall stand cancelled.
4) Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Date: 19.03.2018 scs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the direction to deposit Rs.50,000 as a condition for suspension of sentence causes undue hardship to an employed petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner/Accused
State of Andhra Pradesh
U.Durga Prasad Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
