The High Court granted interim bail for ten days to the petitioner-accused No. 6, who was previously denied bail, directing the police to provide an escort for medical treatment. The order was based on the parity argument raised by counsel.
Petitioner granted interim bail for ten days from 18-03-2018 to 27-03-2018 with police escort.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF IVARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T. RAJANI
CRLP.No. 1955 of 2018
Between:-
S. Ir,4urugan @ N/uruga, S/o. Subrahmanyam.
Petit io n erAccu sed No.6
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Station House Officer, Chittoor I Town Police Station, Chittoor District, Represented by Public Prosecutor, For the State of Andhra Pradesh, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.
RespondenUComplainant
Petition filed under Sections 437 & 439 Cr.P.C. praying that in the
circumstances stated in the Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be
pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in S.C.No. 1'10 of 2016 on the file of the
Court of the lX Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor
Thepetition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the memorandum of grounds
filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Karri lr/uralikrishna,
Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecuto(AP) on behalf of
Res pond enlState, the Court made the following ORDER :-
SMT, JUSTICE T,RA]ANI
CRIMINAL P ETITIO No. 1955 OF 2o1a
ORDER:
This petition is filed, under Sections 437 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking for grant of bail to the petitioner-accused No. 6 in Crime No. 130 of 2015 of Chittoor I Town Police Station, Chittoor District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, l4B, 201, 2t2, 216, 302, 307, 326, t20-B and 109 read with Section 149 IPC and Sections 25 (1A), 2s (1AAA), 2s (18) (a), 2s (18) (c), 27 (3) and 30 of the Arms Act, 1959.
1 lzoos; B scc 3Bo
l
( stares at the ca€€+"ffrepetitioner, this Court cannot do beyond it. The petitioner approached this Court again by virtue of Criminal Petition No. 9393 of 2017 but this Court, by considering all the above facts, dismissed thepetition.
sD/--v. DI WAI(AI{ GISTRAR ASSISTANT
IITRUE COPY|I
for ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
-4
To 1.The lX Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor. 2.The lV Additional Judicial l\ilagistrate of First Class, Chittoor. 3.The lX Additional Judicial IVlagistrate of First Class, Chittoor. 4.The Sub Division Police Officer, Chittoor. s.The Station House Officer, Chittoor lTown Police Station Chittoor District. 6.The Superintendent, District Jail, Chittoor. 7.Two CCs to the Public Prosecuto(AP), High Court at Hyd.(OUT) 8.One CC to Sri Karri Muralikrishna, Advocates(OPUC) 9.One spare copy. TKK
TIIGI.I COUR'I
TIl.,l
D]'.t5-03-20I8.
INTERINl BAIL ORDEIT
'|
ta.I r$;
.]'., '. ::i s'
"..)-<br>: I :'.i 1i<br>\c' it. .
Cllt..l'.No. 1955 of 20I tt
REI,EASI' TI IE I'ETITIONEII ON BAIL.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim bail considering parity with other co-accused if bail was granted to the role conductor of the deceased.
Whether the Court can extend the benefit of bail granted on medical grounds to an accused already denied bail by this Court and the Apex Court.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Stafe of Tamil Nadu Vs. S.A. RajalRelied on¶24
3 provisions across 3 enactments
S. Ir,4urugan @ N/uruga, S/o. Subrahmanyam
The State of Andhra Pradesh
T. Rajani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
