The High Court dismissed a petition filed to quash criminal proceedings against A2 because the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the case had been compromised and proceedings against A1 had already been quashed, rendering the current petition infructuous.
Criminal Petition is dismissed as Infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.14320 of 2013
ORDER:
In this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the petitioner/A2 seeks to quash the proceedings in Crime No. 303 of 2013 of Korutla Police Station, Karimnagar District, which was registered for the offence under Section 160 IPC.
Criminal Petition is dismissed as Infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Date: 06.06.2018 KA
_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Criminal Petition No.14320 of 2013 seeking quashal of proceedings can be adjudicated upon when proceedings against another accused have already been quashed and the case compromised.
Assistant Complainant / A2
Assistant Accused / A1
UDURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
