Union of India,Rep.by Its G.M.South Central Railway, Sec-Bad v. Venigalla Venkateswara Rao, Guntur and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER C.M.A.No.41 of…
DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER C.M.A.No.41 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTI CE SHAMEEM AKTHER
C.M.A.No.4 1 of 2 0 1 0
JUDGMENT:
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (‘the Act’, for brevity), is filed by the appellant-Union of India represented by the General Manager, South Central Railways, Secunderabad, challenging the order, dated 06.08.2009, passed in O.A.A.No.373 of 2003 by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench at Secunderabad (‘the Tribunal’, for brevity).
2
both the legs. The Tribunal rightly appreciated the entire material on record and granted compensation. There is no infirmity in the impugned order and ultimately, prayed to dismiss the appeal.
the Tribunal was pleased to frame the following issues:
3
Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall
stand closed.
______________________ Dr . SHAMEEM AKTHER, J
Date: 23.10.2018 ssp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed by the appellant against the Railway Claims Tribunal order granting compensation to the injured passenger is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India
Injured Applicant
DR SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court