Allowed

K Hanumantha Reddy, Ysr Kadapa Dist v. Revanuru Nagaiah, Ysr Kadapa Dist and 4 Others

Telangana HC26 Oct 2018CMA/358/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

(26.10.2018) The Court set aside an order dismissing applications for condonation of delay in setting aside an ex parte decree. The civil miscellaneous appeal and civil revision petition were allowed subject to depositing one-third of the ex-parte amount within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Condionadoal of delay IAs and appeals allowed, subject to deposit of one-third of the E.P. amount.

K Hanumantha Reddy, Ysr Kadapa Dist Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.358 of 2017 & CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1259 of 2017

¶2

DATE: 26-10-2018

¶3

Between: K.Hanumantha Reddy AND

¶4

..... APPELLANT/PETITIONER

¶5

Revanuru Nagaiah and 4 others

¶6

.....RESPONDENTS

¶7

COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : Mr.JANARDHANA REDDY PONAKA
For Mr.VENKAT REDDY KODUMURY
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT No.1: Mr.G.RAMESH BABU

¶8

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶9

CVNR,J & TA,J CMA.No.358 of 2017 & anr.

¶10

¶11

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE T.AMARNATH GOUD CI VI L MI SCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.358 of 2017 & CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON No.1259 of 2017

¶12

COMMON JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)

¶13

These two cases arise out of common order, dated 18.11.2016, in I.A.Nos.945 & 946 of 2015 in O.S.No.21 of 2012, on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa, whereby he has dismissed I.A.No.945 of 2015 filed for condonation of delay of 566 days in filing I.A.No.946 of 2015 for setting aside the ex parte decree.

¶14

Having regard to the fact that the appellant/petitioner is one of the judgment debtors, and in the light of the offer made by the learned counsel, representing him, that he is prepared to deposit 1/3^rd of the E.P amount, Mr.G.Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for respondent No.1, fairly agreed for setting aside the impugned order so as to give an opportunity to the appellant/petitioner to contest the suit on merits.

¶15

Accordingly, the common order, assailed in these cases, is set aside. I.A.Nos.945 & 946 of 2015 are allowed, subject to the appellant/petitioner deposing to the credit of E.P.No.117 of 2014, 1/3^rd of E.P.amount within 8 weeks from today. The amount so deposited shall be kept in an interest yielding fixed deposit till the disposal of the suit. In default of compliance of the condition, stipulated above, with regard to depositing of the money, this order would automatically stand nullified and both the I.As shall stand dismissed.

¶16

The civil miscellaneous appeal and the civil revision petition are accordingly allowed, subject to the condition, stipulated above. No order as to costs.

¶17

CVNR,J & TA,J CMA.No.358 of 2017 & anr.

¶18

¶19

As a sequel to disposal of these two cases, I.A.No.1 of 2017 in CMA No.238 of 2017. filed for interim relief, shall stand disposed of as infructuous.

¶20

____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J

¶21

_____________________ T.AMARNATH GOUD,J

¶22

Date: 26.10.2018 Dsr

K Hanumantha Reddy, Ysr Kadapa Dist v. Revanuru Nagaiah, Ysr Kadapa Dist and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K Hanumantha Reddy, Ysr Kadapa Dist v. Revanuru Nagaiah, Ysr Kadapa Dist and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maji Sanyasirao Vs Maturu Narayana Rao

Mr Mohd Ajaaz Habeeb Qureshi Vs Mr Mohd Imtiaz Ahmed Qureshi

Niketan Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Katta Sulochana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K Hanumantha Reddy, Ysr Kadapa Dist Vs R Nagaiah, Ysr Kadapa Dist and 4 Others

Prathipati Babu Rao Vs State, Rep.by P.P., H.C., of a.P., Hyd.