Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arising from a motor vehicle accident compensation claim where the appellant challenged the Tribunal's award. The court enhanced the compensation by correcting the multiplier and adjusting the deceased's annual income.
Compensation enhanced from Rs. 2,03,000 to Rs. 2,61,000 with interest at 9% per annum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.2474 OF 2003
JUDGMENT :
This appeal is filed by the appellant-claimant No.1 under Section 173 of the M.V. Act, aggrieved by the order, dated 25.3.2003, in M.V.O.P.No.450 of 1999, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-IV Addl. District Judge, Guntur, for enhancement of compensation.
2
determination is whether the appellant is entitled for enhancement of compensation.
1 (2009) 6 SCC 121
3
till the date of realization. The claimants in M.V.O.P. i.e., appellant and respondents 3 and 4 herein are entitled to share the enhanced compensation amount equally. There is no change of other conditions in the order of the Tribunal.
__________________________ DR.SHAMEEM AKTHER, J
DATED: 04-06-2018 Hsd
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal required enhancement.
What is the correct multiplier and annual income to apply for calculation of damages.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sarla Verma (Smt) and Others v Delhi Transport Corporation and AnotherApplied¶6
SARLA VERMA (SMT) AND OTHERS V DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANOTHER
1 provisions across 1 enactments
APPELLANT-CLAIMANT No.1
INSURANCE COMPANY
SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
