The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying cause did not survive for adjudication. Consequently, interim suspension was vacated.
Interim suspension granted on 07.03.2008 is vacated and related miscellaneous petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.147 of 2008
Date: 18.01.2018
Between :
Petta Anantha Lakshmi
… Appellant
And
Petta Bojji Raju
… Respondent COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT : Sri B. Vijay Kumar, counsel representing Sri V.L.N.G.K. Murthy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT : Sri K. Venkatesh
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
CVNR,J & GSP,J
CMA.No.147 of 2008
JUDGMENT : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy)
This appeal is filed against the order and decree dated 10.12.2007 in O.P.No.26 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Kothapeta, East Godavari District.
At the hearing, Sri B. Vijay Kumar, counsel, representing Sri V.L.N.G.K. Murthy, learned counsel for the appellant, submitted that the cause in this appeal does not survive for adjudication.
In view of the said submission, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to the dismissal of the appeal, interim suspension granted by this Court on 07.03.2008 is vacated and CMA.MP.No.364 of 2008 shall stand closed.
__________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
____________________________ GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD, J 18.01.2018. Msr
3
CVNR,J & GSP,J CMA.No.147 of 2008
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.147 of 2008
18.01.2018 Msr
Petta Anantha Lakshmi
Petta Bojji Raju
C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
Gudiseva Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
