This court dismissed a civil miscellaneous appeal after separately dismissing an application for condonation of delay, resulting in the rejection of the appeal.
The appeal is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.143 of 2018
DATE: 24-10-2018
Between: D.Ajay Kumar and another AND R.Narasimha Raju and 2 others
..... APPELLANTS
.....RESPONDENTS
COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS : Sri KARUNAKAR REDDY COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS : --
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CVNR,J & TA,J CMA.143 of 2018
2
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE T.AMARNATH GOUD CI VI L MI SCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.143 of 2018
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
This civil miscellaneous appeal is filed against the order and decree, dated 04.08.2017, in A.O.P.No.1102 of 2012, on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-VI Additional District Judge, Khammam.
Today, vide separate docket order, passed by us, we have dismissed I.A.No.2 of 2018, filed for condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
As a sequel to dismissal of the said I.A, this civil miscellaneous
appeal shall stand rejected.
_______
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J
T.AMARNATH GOUD,J
Date: 24.10.2018 Dsr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil miscellaneous appeal admitting to rejection after dismissal of condonation of delay application.
D.Ajay Kumar and another
R.Narasimha Raju and 2 others
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
T.AMARNATH GOUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
