The Insurance Company filed an appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the Tribunal's award of compensation and interest for damage to a tractor. The Tribunal found the assesment based on evidence.
Compensation award of Rs.73,928/- with 9% interest granted to the motor victim is confirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
C.M.A.No.1149 OF 2004
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the Act’), by the appellant-Insurance Company aggrieved by the order dated 21.11.2003 in O.P.No.430 of 2001 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Cuddapah (for short, ‘the Tribunal’).
2
appellant herein. The appellant got marked Ex.B1 xerox copy of insurance policy and Ex.B2 loss assessment report. There is no oral evidence to prove Ex.B2 loss assessment report. The Tribunal in detail had examined the damage caused to the tractor and awarded compensation, which is based on evidence on record. There is nothing to take a different view. The appeal is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed.
Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J Date: 13.06.2018 ssp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal's order granting compensation of Rs.73,928/ with 9% interest to the motor victim is sustainable on the evidence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Insurance Company
Motor Victim/Owner
Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
