The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn under circular instructions regarding monetary limits. No order as to costs was passed.
No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions pending stood dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
CEA.NO.106 OF 2017
JUDGMENT: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan}
Ms. Sundari R.Pisupati, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Central Excise and Customs and Service Tax, submits that, since this appeal is below the monetary limit of Rs.50,00,000/-, the appellant does not wish to prosecute the appeal in the light of the Circular instructions issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs dated 11.07.2018.
Permission is accorded and the appeal is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
_______________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
__________________________________ (KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J)
7th September 2018 PNB
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
