The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on the submission by the petitioner that the cause no longer survives. There is no substantive legal proposition for general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Writ Petition No.9419 of 2007
ORDER:
Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and that the writ petition has become infructuous.
The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
20th January, 2017 JSU
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Writ Petition No.9419 of 2007
Date: 20.01.2017
JSU
Ramesh Ranganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
