This order dismisses a writ petition because the petitioner failed to file a representation after being directed to do so. The court directed the police not to interfere in pending civil disputes except in accordance with law.
Directions issued to respondent police not to interfere with pending civil disputes except in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 887 of 2013
ORDER :
As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 11.07.2017, the matter was directed to be listed on 12.07.2017, under the caption, ‘for dismissal’. Even today, i.e., on 17.07.2017, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this Court is inclined to pass the following order:
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
17.07.2017 vhb
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to remit the writ petition for hearing or dispose of it due to non-filing of representation.
Whether the police action of interfering in civil disputes is arbitrary.
Petitioner
Respondent No.1
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
