K.Rajesh, Vs The Union of India

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

¶2

AND

¶3

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI

¶4

WRIT PETITION No. 7313 of 2017

¶5

ORDER: (Per VRS,J)

¶6

Aggrieved by a notice of demand issued under Rule 2 of the 2^nd Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961, the assessee has come up with the present writ petition, on the short ground that his statutory appeal is pending before the 3^rd respondent herein.

¶7

Heard Mr. J.U.M.V. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. B. Narasimha Sarma, learned senior standing counsel for the Income Tax Department, takes notice for the respondents.

¶8

The petitioner has not obviously moved an application for stay either before the 2^nd respondent or before the 3^rd respondent. The 4^th respondent himself was entitled to grant stay under Section 220(6), till the matter went before the Tax Recovery Officer. Now that the matter has gone before the Tax Recovery Officer, the petitioner should move an application for stay either before the 2^nd respondent or before the 3^rd respondent.

¶9

Therefore, leaving it open to the petitioner to move the respondents 2 and 3, this writ petition is dismissed. If the petitioner moves an application for stay within one (1) week from the date of

¶10

VRS,J & JUD,,J WP No. 7313 of 2017

¶11

2

¶12

receipt of a copy of this order, the respondents 2 and/ 3 shall consider

¶13

the same on merits and pass orders.

¶14

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the

¶15

writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

¶16

__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J

¶17

J. UMA DEVI, J. 2^nd March, 2017 cbs

¶18

VRS,J & JUD,,J WP No. 7313 of 2017

¶19

3

¶20

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN  AND

¶21

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI

¶22

Writ Petition No. 7313 of 2017

¶23

(dismissed)

¶24

2^nd March, 2017

¶25

cbs

K.Rajesh, v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Rajesh, v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Jagadamba Traders, Vs The Joint Commissioner (Ct)-Ii

M/s. Apollo Health and Lifestyle Limited Vs Mr. Anupam Saraogi of Indian inhabitant

Smt. v.Vijayalakshmi, Vs The High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad

Smt. K.Rajani, Vs The Union of India

K.Rajesh, Vs The Union of India

Smt. K. Surekha, Vs The Union of India