Court disposed of two writ petitions filed by M. Parvathi seeking reinstatement as Sub-Registrar Grade-II as infructuous because the petitioner had already been terminated. Related interim orders were also vacated.
Both writ petitions disposed of as infructuous; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos.7211 & 7213 of 2004
Date:17.8.2017
WRIT PETITION No.7211 of 2004
Between : M.Parvathi, D/o M.Lachanna ..... Petitioner And: The Commissioner & Inspector General of Registration, Stamps and Chief Controlling Revenue & Authority, Hyderabad and three others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. M.Rathna Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP for Registration (AP) WRIT PETITION No.7213 of 2004 Between : M.Parvathi, D/o M.Lachanna ..... Petitioner And: The Govt of AP. Reptd by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad and five others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. M.Rathna Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP for Registration (AP)
The Court made the following:
CVNR, J & GSP, J W.P.Nos.7211 & 7213 of 2004 Dated:17.8.2017
2
COMMON ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
As the petitioner and the subject matter of these Writ Petitions are the same, both the cases are being disposed of together.
Writ Petition No.7211 of 2004 is filed for the following substantive relief:
“… to issue writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in respect of order dt. 03/03/2004 passed in OA.No.6128/99 passed by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal and quash the same as unjust and unsustainable and also declare Proc.No.E1/1223/98 dt. 31/12/1998 and Proc.No.E1/1809/99 dt. 28/08/1999 issued by the 2nd and 1st respondents respectively, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Rules and set aside the same and consequently, to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Sub-Registrar Grade-II with all the attendant and service benefits in the interest of justice.”
Writ Petition No.7213 of 2004 is filed for the following
substantive relief:
“… to issue Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in respect of order dated 03-03-2004 passed in O.A.NO.6950/98 passed by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal and to quash the same as unjust and unsustainable and consequently, to direct the respondents to
CVNR, J & GSP, J W.P.Nos.7211 & 7213 of 2004 Dated:17.8.2017
3
continue the Petitioner as Sub-Registrar Grade-II in the interest of justice.”
At the hearing, Mr. M.Rathna Reddy, the learned counsel
for the petitioner, submitted that as his client has already been terminated, no further orders in the Writ Petitions need be passed.
In view of the same, both the Writ Petitions are disposed of as infructuous.
As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petitions, interim orders, dated 16.4.2004, in WPMP.No.9405 of 2004 and WPMP.No.9407 of 2004 are vacated and the said applications are disposed of as infructuous.
______________________________ JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD
17th August 2017 DR
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions filed for reinstatement of the petitioner as Sub-Registrar should be disposed of as infructuous due to termination of the petitioner.
Whether interim orders passed earlier in related matters should be vacated.
M.Parvathi
Commissioner & Inspector General of Registration
The Govt of AP
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
Gudiseva Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
