A writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a declaration that the denial of permission to construct a compound wall was illegal. After hearing, the petition was disposed of with liberty to work out remedies by law.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to work out his remedies in accordance with law, including filing a fresh application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No.6618 of 2014
ORDER:
This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking to issue a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not issuing permission for the construction of the compound wall of his property in Sy.No.18 of Allapur village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner, dated 25.02.2014.
Heard and perused the material available on record.
Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 2 and 3 placed on record the written instructions received from the respondent authorities, wherein it is stated that as far back as on 20/ 26.03.2014 itself, the application of the petitioner was examined and rejected by the respondent authorities.
In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies in accordance with law, including filing of fresh application.
There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J March 20, 2017 KTL
_____________________
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to issue a writ of mandamus for declaration of the respondent's refusal to grant permission for construction of a compound wall as illegal and arbitrary.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondents 2 and 3
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
