Petitioner challenged delay in completing investigation; Court noted antagonistic prospectus that charge sheet filed and closed writ petition.
Writ petition closed; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.6616 OF 2017
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the fourth respondent in not completing the investigation in F.I.R.No.40 of 2016, dated 11.02.2016.
The fourth respondent filed counter affidavit stating that the investigation was completed and a charge sheet was also filed before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Suryapet on 19.01.2017 as Inward No.157 of 2017.
In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in the present writ petition. However, it is open to the petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law.
The writ petition is accordingly closed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
__________________________ A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO , J 10.04.2017 pln
Petitioner
Fourth Respondent
A.Ramalingeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
