Disposed

Sri a. Venu Babu v. M/s. The State Bank of Hyderabad

Telangana HC20 Feb 2017WP/5812/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A retired bank employee filed a writ petition alleging service grievances. The court disposed of the petition at the admission stage and granted liberty to submit a fresh representation to the Assistant General Manager within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to make representation to Assistant General Manager within two weeks; bank to decide and communicate within six weeks.

Sri a. Venu Babu Vs M/s. The State Bank of Hyderabad — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.5812 OF 2017

¶3

DATED : 20.02.2017

¶4

Between :

¶5

Sri A. Venu Babu S/o.Sri A.Laxminarayana, Aged about 62 yrs, Occu : Retired as Daftary from NMDC branch of State Bank of Hyderabad R/o.10-6-97, Road No.2, Brindavan Colony, Saroornagar, Hyderabad, T.S.

¶6

.. Petitioner

¶7

And

¶8

M/s.The State Bank of Hyderabad Rep., by its Managing Director, Having head office at Gun foundry, Hyderabad-500 001.

¶9

.. Respondent

¶10

This court made the following :

¶11

¶12

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶13

WRIT PETITION No.5812 OF 2017

¶14

ORDER :

¶15

Heard. With the consent of both counsel this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

¶16

Petitioner is retired from service. Ventilating his service grievance petitioner claims to have submitted several representations to the authorities. But the same were not acted upon causing lot of hardship and suffering to him. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed.

¶17

The documents enclosed to the writ petition would disclose that the representations are forwarded to Assistant General Manager, Region-II, Zonal Office of the respondent-Bank, who appears to be the competent authority.

¶18

Having regard to the above, without expressing any opinion on merits the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the Assistant General Manager, Region-II, Zonal Office, State Bank of Hyderabad, within two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, ventilating all his grievances and referring the earlier representations and correspondence from various authorities addressed to Assistant Manager. On receipt of such representation, the Assistant General Manager, Region-II, Zonal Office, of the respondent Bank shall consider the same, take a decision and communicate the same by a reasoned order to the petitioner. Such decision shall be taken and communicated to the petitioner within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of

¶19

¶20

submission of such representation. There shall be no order as to

¶21

costs.

¶22

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition

¶23

shall stand closed.

¶24

__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J

¶25

20^th February, 2017 Rds

Sri a. Venu Babu v. M/s. The State Bank of Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri a. Venu Babu v. M/s. The State Bank of Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.S. Rao Vs The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation

Boga (Bogi alias Bogu) Siddamma, Vs Gurram Susheela died per L.Rs

A. Venkateswara Rao Vs The State of Telangana. Represented by its Principal

Smt. Baikadi Mallamma Vs The State of Telangana

Doli Bakkaiah, Vs The Chairman and Managing Director

Sirisilla Padma, W/o. Sirisilla Atmaram Vs The Union of India, being Represented by Secretary