M. Pamulu, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO WRIT PETITION…
SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO WRIT PETITION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 5067 of 2009
ORDER:
Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that the cause of
action in the Writ Petition no more survives since the intended lease
period of the mining operation from 1.4.2010 to 31.3.2011 was over long back.
In view of the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, on request, the writ petitioner is granted liberty to
challenge the action of respondents 1 & 2, if any threat is faced.
As a sequel there to, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Date: 07.11.2017 KA
Petitioner
Respondents 1 & 2
U DURGAPRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court