Disposed

Chenetha Karmika Seva Sangham, Regd.No. 279/2004 , v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC20 Feb 2017WP/4228/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

, Writ Petition challenging eviction from house sites in Madanapalle was disposed of. The court directed respondents to allot house site pattas to 70 eligible members listed in the 4th respondent's counter affidavit without further delay.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to allot house site pattas to 70 eligible members of the 1st petitioner-Society as per the list in the counter affidavit without further delay.

Chenetha Karmika Seva Sangham, Regd.No. 279/2004 , Vs The… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No.4228 of 2010

¶2

ORDER :

¶3

Heard counsel for petitioners and the Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents.

¶4

The 1^st Petitioner-Society had filed this Writ Petition challenging the action of the respondents 3 & 4 and their staff in trying to evict the members of the without following due process of law in respect of house sites in survey Nos.672/2, 672/4 and 529 of Kollabailu village, Madanapalle Mandal, Chittoor District. It is further alleged that the 4^th respondent had issued certificates to 64 members of the society allotting house sites vide proceedings No.A/696/2008, dt.17.08.2008.

¶5

71 persons, who claim to be eligible for grant of house sites and who are members of the 1^st petitioner-Society, had filed W.P.MP.No. 50078 of 2016 to implead themselves as petitioners in the Writ Petition and the same was allowed on 02.12.2016.

¶6

According to the counsel for petitioners, there were 145 members in the 1^st petitioner-society and the society was previously known as “Bhagath Sing Chenetha Karmikula Sangam but later the words “Bhagath Sing” were dropped. He contends that originally this land belongs to an assignee from the Government and it was later purchased by the society, but the assignment in favour of the earlier assignee itself was cancelled on 03.02.2007. He contends that since the members of the 1^st petitioner-society are poor persons, they ought to be granted land by the Government for house sites.

¶7

In the counter affidavit filed by the 4^th respondent, it is stated that 70 members of the 1^st petitioner-society were found eligible for assignment and he recommended to the District Collector, Chittoor on 05.05.2011 to grant them house site pattas and the list of 70 persons was also approved by the Municipal Commissioner, Madanapalle and also verified by the Revenue Inspector and Village Revenue Officer, B.K.Palle. It is further stated that due to the pendency of this Writ Petition as well as two other Writ Petitions No.1531 of 2011 and 40260 of 2014, action was not taken for delivering possession of the plots for construction of houses.

¶8

Having regard to the stand taken by the 4^th respondent that 70 members of the 1^st petitioner-society have been identified as eligible for grant of house site pattas, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to allot house site pattas to 70 members of the 1^st petitioner-Society found to be eligible as per the list mentioned in the counter affidavit of the 4^th respondent without any further delay. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶9

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶10

______________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J

¶11

20^th February, 2017. gra

Chenetha Karmika Seva Sangham, Regd.No. 279/2004 , v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chenetha Karmika Seva Sangham, Regd.No. 279/2004 , v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gudela Adinarayana, Vs Pila Tamma Rao

Smt. Yadangi Sethamahalakshmi Vs Smt. Geddam Chittemma

R. Babu Rao, Vs v. Ramana Rao

Sri N. Ramesh Vs The Sub-Registrar of Assurances

Thota Subba Rao Vs The District Collector

K. Bhoopathi Vs The Executive Engineer