The Hon'ble Court noted that a regularization order for the petitioner's open plot had already been granted vide proceedings No.381/ G1/ LRS/ 2016 dated 22.08.2017. Consequently, no further order was required in the writ petition.
No order as to costs; Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Writ Petition No.38890 of 2017
ORDER:
This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed complaining the inaction in passing regularization orders in respect of the petitioner’s open plot in an extent of 337.73 square yards in Sy.no.1188 of Metpally under Layout Regularization Scheme, 2015, even after collecting the LRS Penalization charges.
2 . I have heard the submissions of Sri Polisetty Radhakrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & urban Development appearing for the 1st respondent; and of Sri N.Praveen Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent. I have perused the material record.
3 . At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner brings to the notice of this Court the proceedings No.381/ G1/ LRS/ 2016, dated 22.08.2017 granting regularization.
4 . Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is closed, as no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ M.Seetharama Murti, J
29.11.2017
Note:- Issue CC in three days (B/ o) RAR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Writ Petition No.38890 of 2017
29-11-2017
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner
Municipal Administration & Urban Development (1st Respondent)
2nd Respondent
M. Seetharama Murti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
