This judgment allowed Writ Petition No.37202 of 2016 by following a earlier decision in a batch of cases dated 13.02.2017. No substantive issue was raised beyond referral to the batch decision.
Writ Petition allowed; pending miscellaneous application closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’ BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND HON’ BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
Writ Petition No.37202 of 2016
ORDER: ( per Hon’ble Sri Just ice V. Ramasubramanian )
The issue raised in this writ petition is covered by a decision rendered by us in a batch of cases i.e., WP No.36483 of 2016 & batch, dated 13.02.2017.
Therefore, following the same, this writ petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
_________
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
J. UMA DEVI, J
Date: 14.02.2017 BSS
2
HON’ BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’ BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
68
Writ Petition No.37202 of 2016
( per Hon’ble Sri Just ice V. Ramasubramanian)
BSS
Date: 14.02.2017
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WP No.36483 of 2016 & batch, dated 13.02.2017Applied¶5
V. Ramasubramanian
J. Uma Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
