Aggrieved thereby, both the first and second respondents filed WA.No.798 of 2017. In its order, in WA.MP.No.1554 of 2017 in WA.No.798 of 2017 dated 27.06.2017, a Division Bench of this Court noted that earlier a learned Single Judge of this Court had, by his order in WP.No.21229 of 2013 dated 18.06.2015, accepted the expenditure incurred by the petitioner, and had directed the second respondent to fix the fee structure accordingly; this, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, would result in their being entitled to collect fees of Rs.1,40,000/-; this order in WP.No.21229 of 2013 dated 18.06.2015 continued to remain in force as no appeal had been preferred thereagainst till date; the learned Single Judge had, in the order under appeal, prescribed the annual fee at Rs.1,60,000/-; and the difference per student would be Rs.20,000/- per annum. The Division Bench considered it appropriate to permit the petitioner to collect fees at Rs.1,60,000/- per student per year subject to the condition that, within ten days of receipt of the fees from each of the students concerned, they should furnish a bank guarantee in favour of the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court for the differential amount of Rs.20,000/- per student; the bank guarantee was to
