A single judge disposed of a writ petition by directing the appellate authority to decide the pending appeal within two months, noting the presence of an appeal provision against the impugned order.
Appellate authority directed to dispose pending appeal within two months; miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.30375 of 2017
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order dated 20.06.2017 passed by the third respondent canceling the authorization of the petitioner, who is a fair price shop dealer of Shop No.10 of Peridepi Village, Kodepi Mandal in Prakasam District.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order was passed in violation of the orders of this Court and the circulars issued by the Department.
Since there is a provision of appeal, which was already filed by the petitioner on 10.07.2017, appellate authority is directed to dispose of the said appeal, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner.
The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. The miscellaneous petitions pending in this Writ Petition, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
(A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J)
08.09.2017 vs
Petitioner (Fair Price Shop Dealer)
Third Respondent
A. Ramalingeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
