Dismissed

The Dalith Sankshema Sangha (Regd) R.R.District, v. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC21 Aug 2017WP/27796/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought declaration that imposing a new housing scheme violated fundamental rights and was arbitrary. Court dismissed the petition, granting liberty to approach the appropriate remedy against the Tahsildar's communication regarding regularization.

What did the court decide?

No order as to costs; petition dismissed with liberty to approach appropriate remedy.

The Dalith Sankshema Sangha (Regd) R.R.District, Vs The… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION NO.27796 of 2017

¶3

Date: 21.08.2017

¶4

Between:

¶5

The Dalith Sankshema Sangha (Regd.), R.R.District, Unit rep., by its General Secretary, Sangam Shanker, S/o.Late Muthaiah, Aged 39 yrs, Occu : Labour, R/o.Dr.Ambedkar Nagar (Indira Nagar), Chaitanyapuri, Hyderabad.

¶6

…..Petitioner And

¶7

The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & others.

¶8

…..Respondents

¶9

The Court made the following:

¶10

¶11

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO.27796 of 2017

¶12

ORDER:

¶13

This writ petition is filed praying to declare arbitrary action of the respondents in imposing the new housing scheme on the members of the petitioners association as violative of Article 14 to 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and direct not to interfere with its peaceful possession and enjoyment. 2. Petitioner filed the letter of Tahsildar, Uppal Mandal, dated 18.03.2017 addressed to the counsel representing the petitioner, in response to the legal notice (Ex.P.4) issued by the petitioner, which would disclose that in consideration of the earlier direction of this Court in W.P.No.19017 of 2005, decision was communicated to him that the claim for regularization of the alleged possession cannot be granted and that the land is identified for construction of two bed room houses for weaker sections. This communication is not under challenge nor declaration was sought against the decision as contained in the letter referred to above.

¶14

Granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available in law, aggrieved by the communication given to the counsel on record, in response to the legal notice, by the Tahsildar, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶15

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

¶16

__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J

¶17

21^st August, 2017 Note : Issue c.c. in one week. B/o. Rds

The Dalith Sankshema Sangha (Regd) R.R.District, v. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Dalith Sankshema Sangha (Regd) R.R.District, v. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Talla Hari Kishan Vs State of Telangana

Anwar Khan Vs The State of Telegana

Bonthu Vijayalakshmi , Beela Manga Satya Kanakadurga Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Lakkineni Narendra Babu Vs The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary

R. Rama Krishna Reddy, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt. Ravipati Aruna Kumari, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh