Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging suspension and seeking reinstatement. The court found the petitioner was already reinstated by the time of hearing and closed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.26687 OF 2017
O R D E R :
This petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings vide Rc.No.1454/2017/FA2, dated 21.05.2017, issued by the 1st respondent suspending the petitioner from service, as illegal and arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the respondents to forthwith reinstate the petitioner into service and issue appropriate posting orders to the petitioner in terms of G.O.Rt.No.83, Environment, Forests, Science & Technology (For.II) Department, dated 27.05.2017, with arrears of salary.
This Court, on 16.08.2017, heard both sides and reserved the matters for orders.
When this Court is about to pronounce the Judgment, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is already reinstated into service, as such, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in
the writ petition, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 23.11.2017 t k.
Petitioner
1st Respondent
A.Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
