Dismissed

Stuvartpuram Girijana Colonization Society, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC3 Aug 2017WP/25802/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the non-allotment of agricultural land to a registered cooperative society. The court held that no prima facie case existed to grant the relief as the petitioner failed to substantiate its claim of entitlement to the land.

What did the court decide?

Relief sought by the petitioner society to allot agricultural land was denied and the writ petition dismissed with no costs.

Stuvartpuram Girijana Colonization Society, Vs The State… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA

¶2

PRADESH

¶3

THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND SEVENTEEN

¶4

Present

¶5

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION No.25802 of 2017

¶7

Between:

¶8

Stuvartpuram Girijana Colonization Society, (Registration No.357 of 2016) 10-113B/Stuvartpuram, Bapatla Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Treasurer China Venkateswarlu Chouta S/o Davedu

¶9

.. Petitioner

¶10

AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others. The Court made the following:

¶11

.. Respondents

¶12

¶13

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.25802 of 2017

¶14

ORDER:

¶15

This writ petition is filed praying to grant the following relief:

¶16

“to issue writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2^nd respondent for not allotting the agricultural lands at Epurupalem Village under Sy.Nos.64/1, 64/3 309/1C and 310/1 to an extent of Ac.34-13 which belongs to the Schedule Tribe (Yerukula Tribal) of Stuvartpuram to Stuvartpuram Girijana Colonization Society, a Cooperative Society registered vide registration No.357 of 2016 in accordance to G.O.Ms.No.193, dated 01.12.1976, as illegal and arbitrary”

¶17

It appears that the petitioner’s society was formed and registered on 29.10.2016. The said Society now claims allotment of agricultural lands in Epurupalem Village in Sy.Nos.64/1, 64/3 309/1C and 310/1 to an extent of Ac.34-13. The record discloses that the Government allotted the huge extents of land for the purpose of taking charge of the settlement from the Salvation Army. However, the entire extent of land allotted was not put to use. In regard to subsequent development, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.193,

¶18

¶19

dated 01.12.1976. The Government took note of the report submitted by Director of Tribal Welfare and passed orders stating that there are no internees, who are still in the habitual offenders list, the denotified settlements at Stuartpuram and Sitanagaram in Guntur District be converted as free settlements with immediate effect.

¶20

A reading of the affidavit filed in support of the petition does not disclose how members of the petitioner’s society are considered for settlement from the Salvation Army in the year 1930 and the land which was earmarked by the Government can be allotted to the petitioners.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to place reliance on the proceedings of the Collector dated 13.10.1992 marked as Ex.P3, in support of the prayer sought in the writ petition. A reading of the proceedings would disclose that taking note of the report of Mandal Revenue Officer, Bapatla, he was permitted to accept the relinquishment offered by the Salvation Army and requested to take possession of the land relinquished by. If the land belongs to Government, it is for the Government to take appropriate steps for proper utilization of the said land or to assign the said land for needy people. But the petitioners by forming the Society

¶22

¶23

are claiming for allocation of the land in purported reference to place where the Society is registered and claiming as if they belong to original community formed by the Salvation Army.

¶24

Thus, the relief as sought for, by the petitioner’s Society cannot be granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

¶25

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Contempt Case shall stand dismissed.

¶26

____________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 03.08.2017 dv

¶27

¶28

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶29

WRIT PETITION No.25848 of 2014

¶30

Date:03.08.2017

¶31

Stuvartpuram Girijana Colonization Society, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Stuvartpuram Girijana Colonization Society, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Putti Srinivas Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh represented By its Principal

Chinnapu Ramasubba Reddy, Vs The Government of State of A.P.

Shaik Saida Saheb Vs The State of Telangana

B. Laxmiprasanna, W/o. G. Suresh, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal

Chakkala Dharmaraju Vs Sri Anjaneya Swamivari Temple of Jammivaru

M/s. B.P.L.Engineering Ltd., Vs M/s. Ashok Brothers