In this writ petition, the petitioner sought intervention under Article 226 to direct compliance of a trial court order appointing an advocate commissioner for a land survey. The High Court held that since the suit was pending in the trial court, the petitioner was not remediless and extraordinary jurisdiction should not be exercised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.25607 of 2017
DATED : 02.08.2017
Between : Arjun Singh S/o.Balram, Aged 64 yrs, Occu : Business, R/o.8-1-431/1, Shaikpet, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.
.. Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, (Revenue Department), Secretariat at Hyderabad & others. .. Respondents
This court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25607 of 2017
ORDER :
Heard.
exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and to grant the relief as prayed for.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J
2nd August, 2017 Rds
2 issues framed by the court
Whether this Court can exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 to direct compliance of a trial court order appointing an advocate commissioner when the matter is pending in the trial cou
Whether the petitioner is remediless if the trial court order appointing an advocate commissioner is not complied with.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Arjun Singh S/o. Balram
The State of Telangana
P.Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
