dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner without recording further facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No.23559 of 2008
ORDER:
Sri M. Rajamalla Reddy, learned counsel for petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and
the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
As a sequel there to, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date: 13.11.2017 KA
Sri M. Rajamalla Reddy
U Durga Prasad Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
