Disposed

Barigela Andalu , P.Andalu, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC13 Jul 2017WP/23160/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the police attempt to dispossess petitioners from land. The Court restrained police from interfering in pending civil proceedings and directed adherence to legal procedure.

What did the court decide?

Respondents-Police restrained from interfering with pending civil disputes; must follow legal procedure before taking action against petitioners.

Barigela Andalu , P.Andalu, Vs The State of Telangana — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.23160 OF 2017

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, came to be filed seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in trying to evict the petitioners and also interfering with their possession and enjoyment in respect of the land admeasuring 0.36 ¾ guntas situated in survey Nos.328 to 331 at Guntapally Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal and arbitrary.

¶4

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself. Since this Court is not going into the merits of the case, there is no necessity to issue notice to respondent No.4.

¶5

The grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is that the respondents-Police, at the instance of respondent No.4, are trying to dispossess the petitioners from the subject lands, referred to above, thereby interfering with the civil disputes pending between the parties.

¶6

Learned AGP, on instructions, denied the allegations made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. He further submits that the respondents-Police never interfered with the civil disputes, which are said to be pending between the parties.

¶7

As seen from the material on record, O.S.No.77 of 2017 on the file of Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Ranga Reddy District at

¶8

¶9

Hayathnagar, filed by the alleged vendor of R-4 herein is pending adjudication and the Court below also passed an order of Status Quo in said suit.

¶10

Having regard to the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents-Police not to interfere with the civil disputes, which are said to be pending between the parties in respect of land admeasuring 0.36 ¾ guntas situated in survey Nos.328 to 331 at Guntapally Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. However, if they intend to take any action against the petitioners, they shall follow the procedure established under law.

¶11

Miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, if any,

¶12

shall stand closed. No costs.

¶13

________________________
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, J
13.07.2017
sur

Barigela Andalu , P.Andalu, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Barigela Andalu , P.Andalu, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Ranjit Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Mr.Jagan Mohan Vs Mr.T.Dharmaiah

K.Akkulappa Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary

Boddireddy Srinu, S/o.late Kondarao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

LyagalaSudhakar, Vs The State of Telangana

ltta Krishnaveni, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh