The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous based on the submission that the cause of action did not survive for adjudication.
No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
WRI T PETI TI ON No.21357 of 2007
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the writ petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and that, therefore, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Sri R.Sudheer, the learned Standing Counsel for Vijayawada Municipal Corporation representing the respondents is present.
3. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed.
_________________ M.Seetharama Murti, J 01st March, 2017 Bvv
Writ Petitioner(s)
Vijayawada Municipal Corporation
M.Seetharama Murti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
